Da I Siding With The Mages As A Warrior

It s fairly easy to rp a hawke that sees siding with the mages as starting a continental wide war and siding with the templars as bloody de escalation.

Da i siding with the mages as a warrior.

You re standing for order in the hopes that more death can be avoided later on. For a first run i have to recommend the mages. At this point you have a choice to make. It s kirkwall or the world.

The inquisitor is always seen wielding a sword even the ceremonial sword. You ll have two missions you can run from war map and as mentioned before siding with the templars or the mages will permanently lock out the other one. Whoever you do not. So hawke being a mage obviously is set in stone.

Templars versus mages is a major decision thrown on the player throughout the series. Wrong even though i end up siding with the mages 99 of the time anyway. In origins it was more minor. In inquisition you are put in a place where you decide whether to have the mages or templars join the inquisition.

This is actually my canon hawke and he s a goody two shoes blue personality. Hawke is obviously a mage in lore wise because warrior and rogue don t really fit the story. Magic is cool in da and gives a more personal tie to the story. You will get approval and disapproval based on your choice i sided with the mages and i romanced cassandra without any issue she s actually pretty sympathetic towards mages cassandra and vivianne like siding with the templars solas and sera i think like siding with the mages.

I dont remmeber it was all a bit list of spam approval and. In the 2nd game the decision was everywhere and everything exploded to the mage rebellion. Siding with the mages leads you on a quest that involves meeting dorian one of the companion units and a plot that. Blackwall commenting on the decision to side with the rebel mages after completing the quest.

The helm of the inquisitor is meant for a warrior.